4.7 Article

Prediction of butt rot volume in Norway spruce forest stands using harvester, remotely sensed and environmental data

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102624

Keywords

Cut-to-length harvester data; Forest health; Heterobasidion spp; Wood decay; Lidar

Categories

Funding

  1. Norwegian research council through the PRECISION project [11067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study predicted timber volume damaged by butt rot at the stand-level in Norway using harvester information, remotely sensed, and environmental data. Forest attributes characterizing the maturity of the forest were found to be important predictor variables for butt rot damages, with remotely sensed variables being more crucial than the environmental ones. The results show that knowledge about the butt rot status of spatially close stands is important for obtaining satisfactory error rates in mapping the damages.
Butt rot (BR) damage of a tree results from a decay caused by a pathogenic fungus. BR damages associated with Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) account for considerable economic losses in timber production across the northern hemisphere. While information on BR damages is critical for optimal decision-making in forest management, maps of BR damages are typically lacking in forest information systems. Timber volume damaged by BR was predicted at the stand-level in Norway using harvester information of 186,026 stems (clear-cuts), remotely sensed, and environmental data (e.g. climate and terrain characteristics). This study utilized Random Forests models with two sets of predictor variables: (1) predictor variables available after harvest (theoretical case) and (2) predictor variables available prior to harvest (mapping case). Our findings showed that forest attributes characterizing the maturity of forest, such as remote sensing-based height, harvested timber volume and quadratic mean diameter at breast height, were among the most important predictor variables. Remotely sensed predictor variables obtained from airborne laser scanning data and Sentinel-2 imagery were more important than the environmental variables. The theoretical case with a leave-stand-out cross-validation resulted in an RMSE of 11.4 m(3).ha(-1) (pseudo-R2: 0.66) whereas the mapping case resulted in a pseudo-R-2 of 0.60. When spatially distinct clusters of harvested forest stands were used as units in the cross-validation, the RMSE value and pseudo-R-2 associated with the mapping case were 15.6 m(3).ha(-1) and 0.37, respectively. The findings associated with the different cross-validation schemes indicated that the knowledge about the BR status of spatially close stands is of high importance for obtaining satisfactory error rates in the mapping of BR damages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available