4.7 Article

Variability in oral antibiotic step-down therapy in the management of Gram-negative bloodstream infections

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106451

Keywords

Gram-negative; Bacteraemia; Bloodstream infection; Oral step-down

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UM1AI104681]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [1KL2TR002554]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is extensive heterogeneity in oral step-down practices for Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs), with US providers more likely to practice oral step-down than non-US providers. Most providers expressed interest in enrolling patients in a trial of full IV versus early oral step-down for GN-BSIs, indicating a need for further investigation into the optimal role of oral step-down in managing GN-BSIs.
There are important gaps in the literature regarding the role and timing of oral therapy for Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs). To better understand contemporary management practices involving oral step-down in GN-BSI, we conducted an international survey of infectious diseases (ID) specialists. We developed and disseminated an online survey to ID specialists to assess practice patterns involving oral step-down in GN-BSIs, including providers from six continents and 28 countries. chi 2 tests and generalised estimating equations were used to identify factors associated with oral step-down. In total, 277 ID specialists completed the survey (64% physicians, 31% pharmacists). Relative to a line source, oral step-down was more common in abdominal [OR = 1.96 (95% CI 1.48-2.61); P < 0.001], pneumonia [2.24 (1.67- 2.99); P < 0.001], skin [7.26 (4.71-11.20); P < 0.001] and urinary [9.15 (5.73-14.60); P < 0.001] sources of GN-BSI. US providers were more likely to practice oral step-down than non-US providers (OR = 4.35, 95% CI 2.57-7.36; P < 0.001). Moreover, 40% of providers practice oral step-down for some, but not all, sources of GN-BSI. Among all providers, 23-53% (depending on GN-BSI source) recommend extended ( >= 5 days) intravenous (IV) therapy before oral step-down or ongoing IV therapy. Most respondents (76% of all providers; 80% of ID physicians) expressed interest in enrolling patients in a trial of full IV versus early oral step-down for GN-BSI. There is extensive heterogeneity in oral step-down practices for GN-BSI. The optimal role of oral step-down in managing GN-BSIs warrants further investigation. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available