4.5 Article

Water resistance evaluation of a MFU resins with different molar ratio catalyzed with citric acid

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103020

Keywords

Citric acid; Melamine; Adhesive; Water-resistance; ABES; FTIR-ATR

Funding

  1. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy - LEPABE - FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [UIDB/00511/2020]
  2. Project INNOSURF (SI I&DT-Projects in co-promotion) [POCI-01-0247-FEDER-33768]
  3. FEDER (Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the influence of adding urea to MF resin on the water resistance of particleboards and found that the water resistance of the particleboards decreased linearly with increasing urea content.
Urea, in either solid form or in solution, is an additive commonly used to control the viscosity or act as a scavenger in MF (melamine-formaldehyde) and MUF (melamine-urea-formaldehyde) resins for particleboard production. The aim of this work was to evaluate the influence of adding urea to MF (melamine-formaldehyde) resin in terms of the water-resistance of the final particleboards. FTIR-ATR spectroscopy, adhesive bonding evaluation system (ABES) and gravimetric techniques were used. MF and MFU (melamine-formaldehyde-urea) resins were prepared. Urea was introduced as an additive, in different percentages (0, 10, 20, and 30% (on adhesive, dry basis), and citric acid was used as catalyst. Beech veneer strips were bonded together with these formulations and then tested in dry conditions and after immersion in water for 24 h. The effect of urea load on the resin curing reaction in dry and humid joints was studied. Particleboards were produced with MF and MFU (melamine formaldehyde urea) resins with different urea loads and using industrial recycled wood particles as raw material. Particleboard evaluation indicated that the water resistance of the final particleboards decreased linearly with urea addition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available