Journal
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105626
Keywords
Turbulent mixing; Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes; Machine learning; Deep neural networks
Categories
Funding
- Honeywell Aerospace, located in Phoenix AZ (United States)
- Honeywell Aerospace
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study explores the application of Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models using a newly developed machine learning turbulence closure model, TBNN-s, for passive scalar transport. The TBNN-s shows significant improvements in the mean scalar field when trained and tested in the same class of flow, and performs similarly to the baseline model when tested across different classes of flows, demonstrating the potential of the new model in generalization.
This study focuses on Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models for passive scalar transport. A recently developed machine learning turbulence closure, the tensor basis neural network for scalar flux modeling (TBNNs), is applied on two different datasets, an inclined jet in crossflow and a wall mounted cube in crossflow. The TBNN-s consists of a deep neural network that predicts a turbulent diffusivity matrix after being trained on high fidelity datasets. The present work addresses the generality question (i.e. will a model trained in one turbulent flow perform well in a different turbulent flow?) by training and testing across different classes of flows. We show that when trained and tested in the same class of flow, the TBNN-s obtains significant improvements in the mean scalar field over a common baseline model. When trained and tested across different classes of flows, the TBNN-s has a similar performance to the baseline model, which is encouraging since training set extrapolation does not produce the nonphysical results some fear. Further analysis suggests that varying training sets for the same test case produces similar results in terms of alignment of the scalar flux vector, but different turbulent diffusivity matrix magnitudes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available