4.4 Review

A global review of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes

Journal

INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 385-405

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12569

Keywords

cities; conservation; ecological traits; knowledge gaps; pollinators; urban ecology

Funding

  1. Forrest Research Foundation Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Loss of natural habitat through land-use change threatens bees. Urbanisation is a major, increasing form of habitat loss, and it impacts bee diversity and abundance in various inconsistent ways. Urban areas tend to have more abundant but fewer species of bees compared to agricultural areas and natural areas. Factors associated with urban landscapes, such as changes in foraging resources and nesting substrate types and availability, contribute to changes in bee abundance, species richness, and composition. However, studies have varying conclusions due to differences in bee ecological traits, surveyed habitats, geographic regions, and inconsistencies in sampling methodology and definitions. Understanding the features that promote or threaten urban bee diversity is critical for conservation efforts.
Loss of natural habitat through land-use change threatens bees. Urbanisation is a major, increasing form, of habitat loss, and a novel, pervasive form of disturbance known to impact bee diversity and abundance in a variety of often inconsistent ways. We conducted a comprehensive, semi-quantitative review, involving 215 studies, on responses of bees to urban landscapes, and local and landscape variables proposed to influence bee abundance and diversity. Urban areas tend to be favourable habitat for bees compared with agricultural ones, but compared with natural areas, urban areas often host more abundant populations yet fewer species. Factors associated with urban landscapes, including changes in foraging resources and nesting substrate types and availability, contribute to changes in abundance, species richness, and composition of native bee assemblages. However, the conclusions of studies vary greatly because of the difference in the ecological traits of bees, habitats surveyed, and geographic region, as well as noise in the data resulting from inconsistencies in sampling methodology, and definitions of 'urban' and 'natural'. Identifying what biotic and abiotic features of cityscapes promote or threaten the persistence of urban bee diversity is critical. We provide a comprehensive evaluation of how bees (both in aggregate and according to their ecological guild) have responded to the urban environment, identify gaps in knowledge in urban bee ecology, and make recommendations to advance our understanding of bees in urban environments to promote conservation of diverse bee communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available