4.5 Article

Prototyping a business process improvement plan. An evidence-based approach

Journal

INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2021.101812

Keywords

Process mining; Business process improvement; Decision support; Bipartite network analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to assist organizations in developing business process improvement plans by utilizing an evidence-based approach to evaluate organizational diversity and the ubiquity of process behaviors. By identifying behaviors with the greatest potential, prioritizing them, and providing insights into improvement prospects, the study highlights the most secure paths for change.
Knowledge absorption, information, and management tactics play a vital role for organizations to pursue process improvement. In this work, we aim to support organizations in building a prototype business process improvement plan through an evidence-based approach to make the most of the available information and knowledge. We exploit existing data that describe the business process's execution to capture the governing process behaviors. By comparing the process's execution across multiple business units, we assess the versatility of organizations and the pervasiveness of the process behaviors. Through a bipartite network, we suggest the concept of Operations Sophistication and deliver insights for the improvement prospects. Our approach contributes by identifying the behaviors with the greatest potential in a rapid and evidence-based way, by indicating a prioritization customized per organization, and by highlighting the most secure change paths. To illustrate our approach, we applied it to a real-world case from Siemens AG, and we present the methodology and the results through that case study. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available