4.7 Article

Conflicting evidence combination from the perspective of networks

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 580, Issue -, Pages 408-418

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.088

Keywords

Evidence theory; Sensor data fusion; Distance function; Networks

Funding

  1. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [19ZR1420700]
  2. Shanghai Education Development Foundation [16CG60]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [16CG60]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Power Station Automation Technology [13DZ2273800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a new evidence combination method based on the interaction among nodes in complex networks, which combines evidence efficiently using weighted average and Dempster's rule of combination, showing better performance through a numerical example.
Dempster-Shafer evidence theory is widely used in the field of information fusion especially when confronting with uncertainties. However, Dempster's rule of combination may lead to counter-intuitive results when dealing with highly conflicting bodies of evidence (BOEs). Numerous methods were proposed to address this problem. Enlightened by the research of interaction among nodes in complex networks, this paper study the combination of evidences from the perspective of networks: BOEs are regarded as nodes, the conflicting degree between BOEs is considered as one possible interaction between nodes. The direct and indirect interactions among nodes in networks are considered together to determine the weights of the BOEs. After process of weighted average, the modified BOEs can be efficiently combined by Dempster's rule of combination. A numerical example is illustrated to show the use and better performance of the proposed method. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available