4.7 Article

Asymptotic stability of probabilistic logical networks with random impulsive effects

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 579, Issue -, Pages 667-684

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.08.017

Keywords

Probabilistic logical networks; Asymptotic stability; Random impulsive effects; Homogeneous Markov chains; Invariant subsets

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61573096, 61833005, 12061088]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Networked Collective Intelligence [BM2017002]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBPY2136]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the asymptotic set stability of probabilistic logical networks with random impulsive disturbances, proposing novel methods to reduce complexity. An HMC is obtained by sampling at impulsive instants, leading to necessary conditions for stability of the impulsive network.
This paper investigates the asymptotic set stability of probabilistic logical networks (PLNs) with random impulsive disturbances. A hybrid index model is applied to describe the impulsive PLN. Both the sequence of switching signals and the sequence of impulsive intervals are assumed to be independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.). Some novel methods are proposed to reduce the complexity of calculating invariant subsets and verifying the convergence of homogeneous Markov chains (HMCs). By sampling at impulsive instants, an HMC is obtained from the impulsive PLN, whose initial distribution and transition probability matrix (TPM) are approximately calculated. Based on the obtained HMC, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the asymptotic set stability of the impulsive PLN in hybrid domain and time domain are presented, respectively. Finally, examples are given to illustrate the main results. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available