4.4 Article

Zoonotic vector-borne bacteria in wild rodents and associated ectoparasites from Tunisia

Journal

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105039

Keywords

Wild rodents; Ectoparasites; Vector-borne bacteria; Molecular typing; Phylogeny; Tunisia

Funding

  1. Research Laboratory Labo-ratoire d'epidemiologie d'infections enzootiques des herbivores en Tunisie - Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia [LR01AGR16]
  2. Research Project Screening and mo-lecular characterization of pathogenic and zoonotic bacteria of medicaland economic interest in cattle and camel ticks in Tunisia - Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia [19PEJC07-22]
  3. Research Project Study of the bacterial microbiota in ticks with a medical and economic impact in Tunisia: contribution to the control of vector-borne bacterial diseases - Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia [P2ES2020-D4P1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wild rodents in Tunisia were found to be potential carriers of zoonotic vector-borne bacteria. Molecular screening revealed infections with Anaplasma, Rickettsia, and Bartonella spp. in rodents, highlighting a serious risk of bacterial transmission and the necessity of controlling rodent populations.
Wild rodents are considered as potential carriers of several zoonotic vector-borne bacteria but their epidemiology is poorly understood in Tunisia. A total of 305 biological samples (100 spleens, 100 livers, 100 kidneys, and 5 pooled ectoparasites (Xenopsylla cheopis, Laelaps echidninus, Ornithonyssus sp., Hoplopleura sp. and eggs of the rat fleas)) were collected from 100 wild rodents from three Tunisian governorates. Molecular screening was performed to reveal infections with main vector-borne bacteria. Captured rodents belonged to three rodent genera and species including Rattus rattus (n = 51, 51%), Meriones shawi (n = 24, 24%) and Mus musculus (n = 25, 25%). Examined rodents were found to be heavily infested by the rat flea X. cheopis (n = 32, 47%) and the rat mite L. echidninus (n = 22, 32.3%). However, the rat mite Ornithonyssus sp. (n = 13, 19.1%) and the rat lice Hoplopleura sp. (n = 1, 1.5%) were rarely identified. Based on 16S rRNA and msp4 genes, infection with Anaplasmataceae bacteria was detected in six specimens of R. rattus and one M. shawi. Pathogenic A. phagocytophilum (n = 1), A. phagocytophilum-like 1 (Anaplasma sp. Japan) (n = 1), and A. ovis (n = 5) were identified. On the basis of ompB, ompA and gltA genes, infection with Rickettsia spp. was identified in three specimens of R. rattus and one of M. shawi. Five Rickettsia species of the spotted fever group, corresponding to R. monacensis, R. helvetica, R. massiliae, R. africae, and R. aeschlimannii, were detected in mixed infections. Bartonella henselae DNA was also found in two R. rattus, based on rpoB partial sequences. All revealed Anaplasma, Rickettsia and Bartonella bacteria were detected in spleen samples. Ehrlichia, Coxiella and Borrelia spp. were not identified in any of the tested samples. In Tunisia, this is the first report indicating infections with Anaplasma, Rickettsia and Bartonella spp. in wild rodents, particularly present alongside domestic livestock and human. This represents a serious risk of potential bacterial transmission. Thus, controlling rodent population in animal herds, residential areas and sensitizing local people to this risk seem absolutely necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available