4.7 Article

Adaptive Integral Sliding Mode Control in the Presence of State-Dependent Uncertainty

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 3885-3895

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2022.3145910

Keywords

Adaptive integral sliding mode; aerial vehicle; Euler-Lagrange dynamics; state-dependent uncertainty

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [62073074]
  2. Double Innovation Plan [4207012004]
  3. Special Funding for Overseas [6207011901]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a variant of AISMC with reduced a priori knowledge of the system uncertainty, utilizing a structure-independent parametrization. The method is analyzed in the Lyapunov stability framework and validated in systems with different structures.
Adaptive integral sliding mode control (AISMC) is an extension of adaptive sliding mode control which is a way to ensure sliding motion while handling system uncertainties. However, conventional AISMC formulations require to different extent a priori knowledge of the system uncertainty: either the upper bound of the uncertainty or of its time derivative are assumed to be bounded a priori, or the uncertainty is assumed to be parametrized by some structure-dependent factorization. This work proposes a variant of AISMC with reduced a priori knowledge of the system uncertainty: it is shown that Euler-Lagrange dynamics typical of sliding mode literature admit a structure-independent parametrization of the system uncertainty. This parametrization is not the result of structural knowledge, but it comes from basic properties of Euler-Lagrange dynamics, valid independently on the structure of the system. The AISMC control method arising from this parametrization is analyzed in the Lyapunov stability framework, and validated in systems with different structures: a surface vessel and an aerial vehicle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available