4.7 Article

Assessing the Suitability of King Topologies for Interconnection Networks

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2015.2409865

Keywords

Topology; interconnections (subsystems); data communications; hardware; on-chip interconnection networks; parallel architectures; processor architectures; computer systems organization; interprocessor communications; general; communication/networking and information technology; computer systems organization topology; on-chip interconnection networks; interprocessor communications

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education [FPU AP2010-4900, FPU FPU12/02254]
  2. Spanish Science and Technology Commission (CICYT) [TIN2010-21291-C02-02]
  3. HiPEAC European Network of Excellence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the late years many different interconnection networks have been used with two main tendencies. One is characterized by the use of high-degree routers with long wires while the other uses routers of much smaller degree. The latter rely on two-dimensional mesh and torus topologies with shorter local links. This paper focuses on doubling the degree of common 2D meshes and tori while still preserving an attractive layout for VLSI design. By adding a set of diagonal links in one direction, diagonal networks are obtained. By adding a second set of links, networks of degree eight are built, named king networks. This research presents a comprehensive study of these networks which includes a topological analysis, the proposal of appropriate routing procedures and an empirical evaluation. King networks exhibit a number of attractive characteristics which translate to reduced execution times of parallel applications. For example, the execution times NPB suite are reduced up to a 30 percent. In addition, this work reveals other properties of king networks such as perfect partitioning that deserves further attention for its convenient exploitation in forthcoming high-performance parallel systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available