4.7 Article

Mixed-Integer Convex Optimization for DC Microgrid Droop Control

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 5901-5908

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3083678

Keywords

Voltage control; Microgrids; Optimization; Generators; Resistance; Computational modeling; Distributed power generation; DC microgrids; droop control; optimization methods; power-sharing; voltage control

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a mixed-integer conic optimization formulation for the design of generator droop control, which guarantees global optimality. Compared to classic linear droop control and recent piecewise linear formulations, the results show superior performance in reducing voltage violations and power loss.
Droop control is a viable method for the operation of island DC microgrids in a decentralized architecture. This paper presents a mixed-integer conic optimization formulation for the design of generator droop control, comprising the parameters of a piecewise linear droop curve. The mixed-integer formulation originates from a stochastic optimization framework that considers several operating scenarios for finding the optimal design. The convexity of the mixed-integer problem continuous relaxation gives global optimality guarantees for the design problem. The paper presents computational results using a tight polyhedral approximation of the conic program, leading to a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem that is solved using a state-of-the-art commercial solver. The results from the proposed approach are contrasted with both a classic linear droop control design and a recent piecewise linear formulation. The Monte-Carlo simulation results quantify the extent to which the MILP solution is superior in reducing voltage violations and power loss, and the degree to which the loss is close to that from a conic optimal power flow solution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available