4.8 Article

Suppression of Chattering in the Real-Time Simulation of the Power Converter

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
Volume 36, Issue 10, Pages 11944-11952

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3069099

Keywords

Switches; Real-time systems; Integrated circuit modeling; Numerical models; Load modeling; Zirconium; Topology; Chattering; FPGAs; power electronic system modeling; real-time simulation

Funding

  1. European Commission H2020 Grant PANDA (H2020-LC-GV-2018), EU [824256]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a zero-regulation method for FPGA-based real-time simulation to address the chattering problem under light-load, achieving unified modeling of CCM and DCM, as well as improving accuracy and stability.
The achievement of the time-step below 500-ns in the field-programmable-gate-arrays (FPGAs)-based real-time simulation is of importance for the power converters having high switching frequencies. However, most of the existing focus on addressing the power converter modeling under the continuous conduction mode (CCM). Nevertheless, toward practical applications, the modeling of discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) with a light-load is of a greater challenge due to the chattering around zero point. In order to solve the chattering problem under the light-load, this article proposes a zero-regulation (ZR) method for FPGA-based real-time simulation. The proposed ZR method can not only represent CCM and DCM with a unified formula but also solve the chattering problem and improve accuracy and stability. In addition, results using different switch models are also given to demonstrate the feasibility and the generality of the proposed method. Finally, a case study of the series load resonant converter is presented. Simulation results are validated against a reference model at a 100-ns time step and a 10-kHz switching frequency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available