4.8 Article

Semi-Supervised Heterogeneous Domain Adaptation: Theory and Algorithms

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3146234

Keywords

Transfer learning; machine learning; classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semi-supervised heterogeneous domain adaptation (SsHeDA) aims to train a classifier for the target domain with limited labeled and unlabeled data, by leveraging knowledge from a heterogeneous source domain. Although several methods have been proposed, there is still a lack of theoretical foundation to explain and guide better solutions for the SsHeDA problem.
Semi-supervised heterogeneous domain adaptation (SsHeDA) aims to train a classifier for the target domain, in which only unlabeled and a small number of labeled data are available. This is done by leveraging knowledge acquired from a heterogeneous source domain. From algorithmic perspectives, several methods have been proposed to solve the SsHeDA problem; yet there is still no theoretical foundation to explain the nature of the SsHeDA problem or to guide new and better solutions. Motivated by compatibility condition in semi-supervised probably approximately correct (PAC) theory, we explain the SsHeDA problem by proving its generalization error - that is, why labeled heterogeneous source data and unlabeled target data help to reduce the target risk. Guided by our theory, we devise two algorithms as proof of concept. One, kernel heterogeneous domain alignment (KHDA), is a kernel-based algorithm; the other, joint mean embedding alignment (JMEA), is a neural network-based algorithm. When a dataset is small, KHDA's training time is less than JMEA's. When a dataset is large, JMEA is more accurate in the target domain. Comprehensive experiments with image/text classification tasks show KHDA to be the most accurate among all non-neural network baselines, and JMEA to be the most accurate among all baselines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available