4.5 Article

Reliability of Error Correction Codes Against Multiple Events by Accumulation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 169-180

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2022.3143652

Keywords

Error correction codes; Error correction; Estimation; Very large scale integration; Protons; Probability; Physics; Error correction codes (ECCs); multiple bit upsets (MBUs); single event effects (SEEs); SRAM

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO Projects [TIN2017-87237, PID2020-112916GB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article studies the reliability of state-of-the-art ECC techniques designed for memories to maintain data integrity under radiation or hazardous conditions. Easy-to-use equations are provided to estimate the probability of error occurrence in a memory implementing different ECCs.
Modern nanoscale devices with storage capacity typically implement error correction codes (ECCs) in order to cope with the effects of natural radiation. Thus, different state-of-the-art ECC techniques aim at preventing data corruption when different numbers of errors (or bitflips) occur in the same logical memory word. However, even though bit interleaving prevents a single particle (such as a proton or a neutron) from flipping several cells in the same word, it cannot be discarded that two independent events may affect nearby cells in the same word and, therefore, would provoke a multiple bit upset (MBU) or equivalent. This article studies the reliability of various state-of-the-art ECC techniques designed for memories to maintain their data integrity under radiation or any other hazardous conditions, where said event accumulation is likely to occur. For this purpose, a set of easy-to-use equations will be provided to estimate the probability of error occurrence in a memory that implements different ECCs, as a function of the number of accumulated bitflips, size of the memory, and word size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available