4.7 Article

Trajectory Control-An Effective Strategy for Controlling Multi-DOF Upper Limb Prosthetic Devices

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3151055

Keywords

Prosthetics; Trajectory; Task analysis; Wrist; Shoulder; Protocols; Performance evaluation; Prosthesis control; prosthetics; upper limb

Funding

  1. Congressionally-Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) [W81XWH-15-10407, W81XWH-15-C-0125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a concept called trajectory control, which improves the control of multiple joint upper limb prostheses by coupling the degrees of freedom of the wrist, elbow, and shoulder into coordinated trajectories driven by a single input variable. Experimental results show that trajectory control allows participants to complete tasks faster with similar levels of body compensation compared to sequential and simultaneous control, and it is also found to be more intuitive and result in more natural movements.
Despite great innovations in upper-extremity prosthetic hardware in recent decades, controlling a multiple joint upper limb prosthesis such as an elbow/wrist/hand system is still an open clinical challenge, in large part due to an insufficient number of control inputs available to users. While simultaneous control is in its early stages, the common control approach is sequential control, in which joints and grasps are driven one at a time. In this paper, we introduce and evaluate a concept we call trajectory control, that builds upon this approach, in which motions of the wrist, elbow, and shoulder DOFs (and subsets of them) are coupled into predefined sets of coordinated trajectories; to be selected by the user and driven with a single input variable. These trajectories were designed based on an earlier motion study of activities of daily life obtained from human demonstrations. We experimentally evaluate the efficacy of our approach through a human subjects study in which tasks are performed in a virtual environment. The results show that as device complexity increased (i.e. greater number of DOFs corresponding to more proximal amputations), participants were able to complete tasks faster with trajectory control while exhibiting similar levels of body compensation when compared to sequential and simultaneous control. Additionally, participants found trajectory control to be more intuitive and displayed more natural movement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available