4.7 Article

Comparative Analysis of a Vehicular Safety Application in NS-3 and Veins

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3014840

Keywords

Safety; Veins; Delays; Cams; Analytical models; Interference; Vehicular communications; IEEE802; 11p; network simulation; NS-3; PhySim-WiFi; Veins; MiXiM

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [304142/2017-4]
  3. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/202.932/2017]
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/24494-8, 15/24490-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article evaluates the behavior of periodic beacon messages in the context of safety applications in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks (VANETs). Experimental and simulation-based evaluations are performed using commercial devices and simulators to assess key metrics such as maximum communication range, packet delivery rate, and packet inter-reception time in V2I and V2V communication scenarios.
Vehicular communications based on IEEE802.11p promise to improve traffic efficiency and safety in the near future. Embedded with 802.11p-compliant devices, the cooperation among connected vehicles will provide a shift in the way transportation systems operate. Nevertheless, before widespread adoption, extensive performance evaluation of the standard is in need. Due to the high cost and reasonably low availability of commercial devices, most work on VANETs is still performed using simulations. To investigate the equivalence between real experiments and simulations involving 802.11p, this article evaluates the behavior obtained by periodic beacon messages, the basis of safety applications in VANETs. Using commercial OBUs and RSUs, the results are compared with those obtained with NS-3/PhySim and Veins/MiXiM simulators. In V2I and V2V communication scenarios, three key metrics are evaluated: the maximum communication range, packet delivery rate, and packet inter-reception time. The influence of different modulations supported by 802.11p and varying vehicle speeds are also analyzed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available