4.8 Article

Structural Coupled Electromagnetic Sensing of Defects Diagnostic System

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 951-964

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3148755

Keywords

Magnetic flux leakage; Pipelines; Probes; Magnetic tunneling; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic circuits; Magnetization; Alternating current field measurement (ACFM); magnetic flux leakage (MFL); multiphysics sensing; pipeline defects

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a new electromagnetic structured coupling sensing method for detecting different types of pipeline defects. By simultaneously interacting the excitation modes of a magnetic yoke and a coil, the method can achieve highly sensitive detection of both surface and subsurface defects.
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection methods are widely used to detect pipeline defects. However, it is limited by the detection orientation and magnetization. Besides, bulky excitation systems are incapable of adapting to the complex detection environments. This article proposes a new electromagnetic structured coupling sensing of merging alternating current field measurement and MFL within a multiparameter system for different types of pipeline defects detection. In particular, a novel electromagnetic coupling sensor structure is proposed, which enables simultaneous interaction between the excitation modes of yoke and coil. Magnetic yoke is integrated to magnetizing the axial pipeline to detect the circumferential surface and subsurface defects while the coil excites the circumferential uniform alternating current field and recognizes the axial defect. The novel structured sensing is highly sensitive to the detection of both surface and subsurface defects. Simulation and experiments on defects in several samples have been conducted to validate the reliability and efficiency of the proposed system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available