4.7 Article

Thick Clouds Removing From Multitemporal Landsat Images Using Spatiotemporal Neural Networks

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3043980

Keywords

Cloud detection; deep learning; geoinformatics; optical imagery; spatial-temporal feature fusion

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFB0503604, 2016YFE0200400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41971405, 41671442]
  3. Special Project of Jiangsu Distinguished Professor [1421061901001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Landsat images are widely used in Earth observation and geoinformatics. However, cloud cover often affects the usability of these images. In this study, a spatiotemporal neural network with four modules was proposed to reconstruct Landsat images, achieving better results compared to existing methods.
Landsat images have played an important role in the field of Earth observation and geoinformatics. However, optical Landsat images are frequently contaminated by cloud cover, especially in tropical and subtropical regions, which limits the utilization of these images. To improve the utilization of Landsat images, in this study, we propose a novel spatiotemporal neural network with four modules: a cloud detection module, a spatial-temporal learning module, a spatial-temporal feature fusion module, and a reconstruction module. The results of the experiments demonstrate that the proposed method is quantitatively effective (root mean square error < 0.0179) and can achieve a better result for reconstructing Landsat images than some of the widely used existing deep learning methods and multitemporal methods. The proposed neural network method provides an effective tool for the removal of contiguous, thick clouds from satellite images, so as to improve the quality of subsequent remote sensing mapping and geoinformation extraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available