4.6 Article

Efficient Modeling of Charge Trapping a Cryogenic Temperatures-Part II: Experimental

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 68, Issue 12, Pages 6372-6378

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2021.3117740

Keywords

4 K; 28-nm bulk CMOS; advanced CMOS; bias temperature instability (BTI); cryoelectronics; cryogenic; physical modeling

Funding

  1. imec's Industrial Affiliation Program on Quantum Computing and Cryoelectronics
  2. Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG (Take off Programm) [861022, 867414]
  3. European Union [871813]
  4. Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs
  5. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development
  6. Christian Doppler Research Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through experimental results and a quantum mechanical model, we found that at low temperatures, the BTI of pMOSFETs is mainly affected by the SiO2 layer, while the BTI of nMOSFETs is mainly affected by the HfO2 layer, and defects in the HfO2 layer do not freeze out at low temperatures.
We present time-zero characterization and an investigation on bias temperature instability (BTI) degradation between 4 and 300 K on large area high-k CMOS devices. Our measurements show that negative BTI (NBTI) on pMOSFETs freezes out when approaching cryogenic temperatures, whereas there is still significant positive BTI (PBTI) degradation in nMOSFETs even at 4 K. To explain this behavior, we use an efficient implementation of the quantum mechanical nonradiative multiphonon charge trapping model presented in Part I and extract two separate trap bands in the SiO2 and HfO2 layer. We show that NBTI is dominated by defects in the SiO2 layer, whereas PBTI arises mainly from defects in the HfO2 layer, which are weakly recoverable and do not freeze out at low temperatures due to dominant nuclear tunneling at the defect site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available