4.7 Article

On Compensating Actuator Delays in Consensus Control Under Undirected Graphs

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL
Volume 66, Issue 10, Pages 4769-4776

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2020.3035690

Keywords

Delays; Protocols; Laplace equations; Actuators; Delay effects; Output feedback; Consensus control; delay-adaptive predictors; output feedback; unknown delay

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91748102, U1813220]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XK1802-4]
  3. CSC scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates delay compensation in consensus control under undirected graphs using output feedback. Two distributed adaptive output feedback consensus protocols are proposed, one ensuring local consensus and the other proven to be a global consensus controller under certain conditions. Simulation results on neutrally stable systems validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
This article studies delay compensation in consensus control under undirected graphs via output feedback. The dynamics of each node involved in the network is subject to an unknown bounded actuator delay. A transport partial differential equation is employed to model the dynamics of the delay state, and a filter with adaptive control gains is proposed using the available relative output information of neighboring nodes. Based on the state of the filter, the estimation delay state, and the delay estimation, we propose two distributed adaptive output feedback consensus protocols. The first one employs a delay-adaptive predictor and guarantees local consensus, whereas the second one, replacing the delay estimation by a constant, is proven to be a global consensus controller provided that the delay mismatch is in a small compact set. Simulation results performed on a group of neutrally stable systems are presented to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available