4.4 Article

Current Distribution Analysis in Bi2223 Tapes of Superconducting Bipolar DC Energy Pipeline

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3094441

Keywords

Bipolar HTS DC cables; degradation of critical current density; current distribution; superconducting DC energy pipeline

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB0904400]
  2. Science and Technology Project of the State Grid Corporation of China [52110418003H]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the current distribution and degradation of Bi2223 tapes in the superconducting DC energy pipeline under different voltage levels, revealing that the currents tend to flow closer to the cable of opposite polarity. The impact of magnetic fields on the critical current density of the cable shows similar degradation levels across different insulation distances between poles.
Superconducting DC energy pipeline incorporates HTS DC cables and the LNG pipeline, and the overall efficiency is improved compared to the conventional HTS DC cables. In the energy pipeline, LNG is cooled down to 90 K at which Bi2223 tapes can still conduct moderate currents although the critical current density J(c) at 90 K drops to about half of that at 77 K. According to the power law, three-dimensional models are constructed to investigate and contrast the current distributions and degradations on helical Bi2223 tapes of the bipolar double-core DC cables under different voltage levels. It is found that the current distributions on Bi2223 tapes tend to the sides which are closer to the cable of opposite polarity. Both the perpendicular and parallel magnetic fields on the surfaces of helical tapes are compared in +/- 100 kV and +/- 10 kV cables. The average degradations of critical current density of the cable influenced by the magnetic fields are estimated and the results indicate that the degradations of critical current density are similar with different insulation distance between poles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available