4.7 Article

Perceiving Graphical and Pictorial Information via Hearing and Touch

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 2432-2445

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2016.2601029

Keywords

Acoustic-tactile representation of visual signals; semantic mapping; sensory substitution; user interface

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a dynamic interactive system for conveying visual information via hearing and touch to blind and visually impaired people. The system is implemented with a touch screen that allows the user to actively explore a two-dimensional layout consisting of one or more objects with the finger while listening to auditory feedback. Sound is used as the primary source of information for object localization, identification, and shape, while touch is used for pointing and kinesthetic feedback. A static overlay of raised-dot tactile patterns can also be added. The head-related transfer function is used for rendering sound directionality, and variations of sound intensity or other features are used for rendering proximity. The main focus is on conveying the shape of an object, but the rendering of a simple scene layout, that consists of objects in a linear arrangement, each with a distinct tapping sound, is also considered and compared to a virtual cane. We consider a number of acoustic-tactile configurations and use empirical studies with visually blocked sighted participants to compare their effectiveness. Our findings demonstrate the advantages of spatial sound (directionality and proximity cues) for dynamic display of information (localization, identification, shape), while raised-dot patterns provide the best static shape rendition. We also show that the proposed configurations outperform existing techniques. The proposed approach is also expected to impact other applications where vision cannot be used.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available