4.7 Article

Similarity Relations of PID Flight Control Parameters of Scaled-Model and Full-Size Aircraft

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3143481

Keywords

Aircraft; Aerospace control; Aerospace electronics; Aircraft propulsion; Aerodynamics; Mathematical models; PI control; Flight control simulation; plus integral plus derivative (PID) control parameters; scaled model; similarity theory

Funding

  1. Fundamental Funds for the Central Universities of China [YWF-19-BJ-J322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, the similarity relations of flight control law parameters between scaled-model and full-size aircraft are studied. The general similarity relations applicable to commonly used flight control law configurations and feedback signals are derived and analyzed. The simulation results of a fighter aircraft and its scaled model validate the proposed similarity relation conclusions.
To carry out a scaled-model flight test of a high-gain aircraft with a proportional plus integral plus derivative (PID) flight control design, the similarity relations of the flight control law parameters of scaled-model and full-size aircraft must be systematically studied. In this article, the general similarity relations applicable to commonly used flight control law configurations and feedback signals are derived and analyzed. Based on the control principle, PID control parameters are divided into two types: feedback gains and series combined dynamic elements. The general similarity relations for the control parameters of these two types of elements are derived from system similarity theory. Finally, closed-loop flight control simulations of a fighter aircraft and its scaled model are completed. The simulation results show that the scaled-model and full-size aircraft with similar PID control law parameters are physically similar, validating the similarity relation conclusions proposed in this article.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available