4.6 Article

GNAS-U2Net: A New Optic Cup and Optic Disc Segmentation Architecture With Genetic Neural Architecture Search

Journal

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 697-701

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2022.3151549

Keywords

Computer architecture; Optical imaging; Image segmentation; Microprocessors; Task analysis; Biomedical optical imaging; Adaptive optics; Artificial intelligence; neural architecture search; convolutional neural network

Funding

  1. Independent Research fund of Key Laboratory of Industrial Dust Prevention and Control and Occupational Health and Safety, Ministry of Education (Anhui University of Science and Technology) [EK20201003]
  2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automatic Detecting Technology and Instruments [YQ21208]
  3. Key Science and Technology Program of Henan Province [212102310084]
  4. Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province [22A520027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new NAS architecture named GNAS-U(2)Net is proposed for medical image segmentation, achieving significant performance improvement. Compared to common U-Net and its variants, GNAS-U(2)Net shows better performance with fewer parameters.
Neural architecture search (NAS) has made incredible progress in medical image segmentation tasks, due to its automatic design of the model. However, the search spaces studied in many existing studies are based on U-Net and its variants, which limits the potential of neural architecture search in modeling better architectures. In this study, we propose a new NAS architecture named GNAS-U(2)Net for the joint segmentation of optic cup and optic disc. This architecture is the first application of NAS in a two-level nested U-shaped structure. The best performance achieved by the joint segmentation model designed by NAS on the REFUGE dataset has an average DICE of 92.88%. Compared to U-2-Net and other related work, the model has better performance and uses only 34.79M parameters. We then verify the generalization of the model on two datasets, namely the Drishti-GS dataset and the GAMMA dataset, for which we obtain an average DICE of 92.32% and 92.11% respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available