4.7 Article

An Accurate WiFi Indoor Positioning Algorithm for Complex Pedestrian Environments

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 21, Pages 24440-24452

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3113376

Keywords

Indoor localization; received signal strength; probabilistic linear discriminant analysis; flow state; fingerprinting localization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a precise WiFi fingerprinting indoor positioning algorithm using improved PLDA, which achieves lower localization error and can simulate different fingerprint maps based on personnel movement states. After simulation, although there is a slight increase in localization error, the workload during the offline training phase is significantly reduced.
This paper proposes a precise WiFi fingerprinting indoor positioning algorithm for complex pedestrian environments. We transform the disturbed received signal strength (RSS) from the original space to latent space using the improved probabilistic linear discriminant analysis (PLDA). In the latent space, Bayes rule is used to calculate the posterior probability of the similarity between the test point and the reference points, and the K reference points with the highest posterior probability are weighted to estimate the position. Actual on-site experiments involving three floors demonstrate that the mean localization error of the proposed algorithm is 1.38 m, which outperforms the Horus algorithm by 29% under the same test conditions. In addition, by studying the variability of mean value of RSS in different pedestrian environments, the fingerprint maps in different states of personnel movement are simulated. By using which, the average localization error of the proposed algorithm increases slightly to 1.63m, while the workload required during the offline training phase is significantly reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available