4.7 Article

VOC Biomarker Monitoring for Diabetes Through Exhaled Breath Using Ag/P-TiO2 Composite Plasmonic Sensor

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages 22631-22637

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3104766

Keywords

Diabetes; volatile organic compounds; optical sensor; finite element method; biomarkers

Funding

  1. Second Century Fund
  2. Rachadapisek Sompote Fund for Intelligent Control Automation of Process Systems Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study discusses a sensor for detecting isopropanol in exhaled breath, which is a biomarker for diabetes. The design of the sensor is based on wavelength modulation technique, utilizing a porous TiO2 layer as sensing material for high sensitivity detection.
The detection of diabetes at an early stage is considered to be highly significant in the successful treatment of the disease. The patient has been reported to generate unique volatile organic compounds (VOCs) profiles in their exhaled breath which can be utilized as biomarkers to diagnosis the disease conditions. In this article, we theoretically report a simple breath sensor for the highly sensitive detection of isopropanol(IPA), which is the biomarker for both types of diabetes, in exhaled breath using a D-shaped composite plasmonic sensor (DSCPS). The sensing response of the sensor is characterized by using a full-vectorial finite element method (FEM) for the detailed analysis of DSCPS, where a porous TiO2 (P-TiO2) layer is used as low index sensing material on the top of thin Ag film. The design of the proposed sensor is based on the wavelength modulation technique. A maximum sensitivity of 0.25, 0.35, 0.45, and 1.35 nm/% can be achieved for 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% volume fraction of IPA, respectively, with a 30% porosity of TiO2, which is the maximum filled porous voids that provides the highest sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available