4.7 Review

Current Sensing Front-Ends: A Review and Design Guidance

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages 22329-22346

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3094830

Keywords

Sensor; current sensing; front-ends; transimpedance amplifier; current conveyor; delta-sigma

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1610516]
  2. Qualcomm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews current-output sensors and current-sensing front-ends, providing comprehensive design guidance from both sensor and circuit perspectives. It discusses various types of sensors and their applications, circuit models, and nonidealities, as well as current-sensing front-ends such as TIAs, CCs, I-to-F converters, and I-Delta Sigma modulators, analyzing their characteristics and tradeoffs between different architectures.
Sensors link the physical and electronic worlds, finding uses in environmental, automotive, industrial, communication, and medical applications, among many more. Here, current-output sensors and current-sensing front-ends are reviewed, aiming to provide readers comprehensive design guidance from both sensor and circuit perspectives. Starting from the transduction method, capacitive, resistive, diode/FET-based, and MEMS sensors are individually reviewed with a focus on applications, circuit models, and nonidealities that must be considered for the front-end design. This is followed by a discussion of current-sensing front-ends, including transimpedance amplifiers (TIAs), current conveyors (CC), current-to-frequency (I-to-F) converters, and current-mode delta-sigma (I-Delta Sigma) modulators. Each front-end is analyzed in terms of gain, bandwidth, stability, noise, and general design considerations are presented. State-of-the-art works for each front-end are then reviewed, and tradeoffs between different architectures are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available