4.7 Article

iCrowd: Near-Optimal Task Allocation for Piggyback Crowdsensing

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 2010-2022

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2015.2483505

Keywords

Mobile crowdsensing (MCS); MCS task allocation; incentives

Funding

  1. EU FP7 MONICA project [PIRSES-GA-2011-295222]
  2. Hobby Postdoctoral and Predoctoral Fellowships in Computational Science
  3. NSFC [61572048]
  4. Microsoft collaborative research grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper first defines a novel spatial-temporal coverage metric, k-depth coverage, for mobile crowdsensing (MCS) problems. This metric considers both the fraction of subareas covered by sensor readings and the number of sensor readings collected in each covered subarea. Then iCrowd, a generic MCS task allocation framework operating with the energy-efficient Piggyback Crowdsensing task model, is proposed to optimize the MCS task allocation with different incentives and k-depth coverage objectives/constraints. iCrowd first predicts the call and mobility of mobile users based on their historical records, then it selects a set of users in each sensing cycle for sensing task participation, so that the resulting solution achieves two dual optimal MCS data collection goals-i.e., Goal. 1 near-maximal k-depth coverage without exceeding a given incentive budget or Goal. 2 near-minimal incentive payment while meeting a predefined k-depth coverage goal. We evaluated iCrowd extensively using a large-scale real-world dataset for these two data collection goals. The results show that: for Goal. 1, iCrowd significantly outperformed three baseline approaches by achieving 3-60 percent higher k-depth coverage; for Goal. 2, iCrowd required 10.0-73.5 percent less incentives compared to three baselines under the same k-depth coverage constraint.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available