4.7 Article

Ultrasonic Measurement of Bolt Axial Stress Using the Energy Ratio of Multiple Echoes

Journal

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 3928-3936

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3132679

Keywords

Fasteners; Attenuation; Stress; Acoustics; Scattering; Stress measurement; Sensors; Stress measurement; scattering attenuation; S transform

Funding

  1. National Natural Foundation of China [62071123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel method for evaluating the axial stress of bolted connections based on the scattering attenuation of polycrystal using the energy ratio of multiple echoes is proposed in this paper. The results of a stress measurement experiment show that the proposed method achieves better sensitivity and reliability in bolt stress detection compared to existing methods.
The reliability and stability of a mechanical system generally counts on the effective detection and control of the stress state of its bolted connections. In this paper, a novel bolt axial stress evaluation method based on the scattering attenuation of polycrystal using the energy ratio of multiple echoes is proposed. Above all, the longitudinal-incident attenuation coefficients for preload cubic crystalline materials in the Rayleigh regime are introduced. In view of the estimation of frequency-dependent attenuation coefficients are prone to suffer from the disturbance of the cylindrical guided waves, the energy ratios of the first two back-end echoes within the signals are applied instead. Subsequently, a stress measurement experiment is conducted to validate the proposed method, in which the accurate energies of the echoes are evaluated using the S transform. The results reveal that, as long as the probe is firmly bonded, the proposed method can achieve better sensitivity and reliability than that of the existing methods using TOF (Time of flight), especially for short or full-threaded bolts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available