4.7 Article

Estimating LAI From Winter Wheat Using UAV Data and CNNs

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2022.3141497

Keywords

Convolutional neural network (CNN); deep learning; drones; leaf area index (LAI); low-cost sensor; plant parameters; regression; remote sensing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential of using UAV-based RGB data and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to estimate the leaf area index (LAI) of winter wheat. The results demonstrate that optical UAV data and CNNs can accurately estimate LAI at different growth stages and lighting conditions. The combination of RGB data and plant structures improves estimation accuracy, particularly for low and high LAI values. The CNN models outperform traditional machine learning methods in terms of accuracy.
With the advent of high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data and advancing methods of deep learning, new opportunities have emerged in remote sensing to assess biophysical plant parameters. In this study, we investigated the potential of UAV-borne RGB data and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to estimate the leaf area index (LAI) of winter wheat during two cropping seasons. In this context, spectral RGB and geometric plant information based on a normalized surface model (nDSM) were used as input variables. The results of the study demonstrated the suitability of optical UAV data and CNNs for LAI estimation of winter wheat at different growth stages and under various lightning conditions. The combination of RGB data and plant structures provided the best overall prediction accuracy (r(2) = 0.83) compared to the models with only one input source (RGB: r(2) = 0.58, nDSM: r(2) = 0.75). Especially the estimation of low and high LAI values was improved using the complementary image information. Moreover, the results showed that the CNN models outperformed two classical machine learning (ML) approaches in terms of accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available