4.7 Article

A Cross-Layer Nonlocal Network for Remote Sensing Scene Classification

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3078468

Keywords

Standards; Correlation; Feature extraction; Convolution; Task analysis; Remote sensing; Computer architecture; Convolutional neural network (CNN); cross-layer nonlocal network (CL-NL-Net); remote sensing scene classification (RSSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this letter, a novel scene classification framework called CL-NL-Net is proposed to improve global scene understanding ability by capturing long-range correlations between different layers. Experimental results show that the method is competitive in terms of classification accuracy.
Remote sensing scene classification (RSSC) is a fundamental yet challenging task in the domain of remote sensing (RS). Currently, the methods based on deep features from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have significantly improved the scene classification accuracy (ACC). However, the standard convolution operations have limited capacity to model the long-range correlations and cannot effectively obtain global contextual understanding ability. In this letter, we propose a novel scene classification framework, termed cross-layer nonlocal network (CL-NL-Net), consisting of a backbone network, a cross-layer nonlocal (CL-NL) module, and a classifier. Among them, the backbone network is used to obtain multilayer convolutional features. The CL-NL module is the core of the proposed method, which captures the long-range correlations between different layers, so as to achieve a better global scene understanding ability. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed CL-NL-Net, we conduct experiments on four benchmark datasets, and the results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves competitive classification ACC and outperforms some state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available