4.7 Article

Remote Sensing Image Translation via Style-Based Recalibration Module and Improved Style Discriminator

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3068558

Keywords

Gallium nitride; Generators; Remote sensing; Generative adversarial networks; Feature extraction; Correlation; Vegetation mapping; Change detection; GAN; image-to-image translation; remote sensing

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018AAA0100602]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1706218]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2019GHY112048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The existing remote sensing change detection methods are often affected by seasonal variations, leading to false detections. The proposed image translation method uses a style-based recalibration module and a new style discriminator to improve the detection performance significantly.
Existing remote sensing change detection methods are heavily affected by seasonal variation. Since vegetation colors are different between winter and summer, such variations are inclined to be falsely detected as changes. In this letter, we proposed an image translation method to solve the problem. A style-based recalibration module is introduced to capture seasonal features effectively. Then, a new style discriminator is designed to improve the translation performance. The discriminator can not only produce a decision for the fake or real sample but also return a style vector according to the channel-wise correlations. Extensive experiments are conducted on the season-varying data set. The experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively perform image translation, thereby consistently improving the season-varying image change detection performance. Our codes and data are available at https://github.com/summitgao/RSIT_SRM_ISD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available