4.6 Article

Improved Channel Electron Mobility Through Electric Field Reduction in GaN Quantum-Well Double-Heterostructures

Journal

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 1592-1595

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2021.3116595

Keywords

Breakdown; electron mobility; gallium nitride; quantum well; transistor

Funding

  1. Innovative Science and Technology Initiative for Security [JPJ004596]
  2. Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Agency (ATLA), Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified the primary reason for the reduced electron mobility in QW GaN-HEMT and proposed a solution to alleviate the electric field and increase electron mobility. As a result, the electron mobility of the QW GaN-HEMT structure was significantly improved.
To improve the electron mobility of quantum well (QW) gallium nitride (GaN) high electron mobility transistors (HEMT), we investigated QW and conventional AlGaN/GaN heterostructures grown by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy. Using calculation and experimental results, we revealed that the primary reason for the reduced electron mobility of the QW GaN-HEMT is the increase in intrasubband scattering events because of excessive electron confinement, which is caused by a strong polarization electric field. A strained Al0.30Ga0.70N/Al0.86Ga0.14N buffer structure was applied to alleviate the electric field in the GaN channel while maintaining a strong electron confinement. It enables to increase the piezo polarization of Al0.30Ga0.70N and thus, reduces that of the GaN channel. Consequently, the electron mobility improved to 1420 cm(2)/Vs for the QW GaN-HEMT structure with the Al0.30Ga0.70N/Al0.86Ga0.14N buffer from 1100 cm(2)/Vs for the common QW GaN-HEMT structure. To the best of our knowledge, 1420 cm(2)/Vs at a two-dimensional electron gas density of 5 x 10(13) cm(-2) is the highest electron mobility in the QW double heterostructure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available