4.6 Article

Sequential Decoding of Short Length Binary Codes: Performance Versus Complexity

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 3195-3198

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2021.3095895

Keywords

Decoding; Measurement; Complexity theory; Signal to noise ratio; Maximum likelihood decoding; Polar codes; Convolutional codes; Decoding complexity; short length codes; sequential decoding; stack algorithm; variable bias-term metric; polar codes

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, sequential decoding of short binary codes for the additive white Gaussian noise channel was examined, with an improved variant of the VBT metric introduced to provide beneficial trade-offs between performance and computational complexity. It was observed that the sequential decoding with the enhanced VBT metric showed a better balance between performance and complexity compared to tail-biting convolutional codes decoded with a wrap-around Viterbi algorithm. However, the performance-complexity tradeoff for the sequential decoding was found to be inferior to polar codes under SCL decoding at high complexities.
Sequential decoding of short length binary codes for the additive white Gaussian noise channel is considered. A variant of the variable-bias term (VBT) metric is introduced, producing useful trade-offs between performance and computational complexity. Comparisons are made with tail-biting convolutional codes decoded with a wrap-around Viterbi algorithm (WAVA) and with polar codes under successive-cancellation list (SCL) decoding. It is found that sequential decoding with the improved VBT metric has a better performance-complexity tradeoff than tail-biting codes under WAVA decoding (except at low complexities) but a worse performance-complexity tradeoff than polar codes under SCL decoding (except at high complexities).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available