4.6 Article

Block-Structured Deep Learning-Based OFDM Channel Equalization

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 321-324

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2021.3133018

Keywords

Convolutional neural networks; OFDM; Optical transmitters; Decoding; Equalizers; Optical receivers; Optical attenuators; Error compensation; equalizers; optical receivers; multiplexing; neural network applications

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter discusses the equalization of an optical signal under the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing modulation scheme, addressing the nonlinear effects caused by a power amplifier (PA) and a transimpedance amplifier (TIA). Comparisons are made between the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and the Wiener-Hammerstein (WH) linearization models, using multiple PA and TIA devices. The study finds that combining CNN with linear equalization leads to a significant improvement in effectiveness. Furthermore, a new block-structured CNN-based solution is developed, incorporating the optimal sequence and providing up to a 2.88 dB Q-factor gain over the traditional WH approach.
This letter considers equalization of an optical signal under the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing modulation scheme. The equalizer mitigates nonlinear effects caused by a power amplifier (PA) in the transmitter and a transimpedance amplifier (TIA) in the receiver. We compare the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and the Wiener-Hammerstein (WH) linearization models using two PA and three TIA devices. We are first to demonstrate a great boost in CNN effectiveness if sequentially combined with a linear equalization. The optimal sequence of linear and nonlinear blocks depends on the device profiles, and is found to be the same between CNN and WH. We develop a new block-structured CNN-based solution that utilizes the optimal sequence and brings up to 2.88 dB Q-factor gain over the traditional WH approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available