4.5 Article

Partitioning evapotranspiration using water stable isotopes and information from lysimeter experiments

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 646-661

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2022.2030866

Keywords

isotopic fractionation; evaporation; transpiration; soybean; mass balance; HYDRUS-1D

Funding

  1. European Union [773903]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stable isotope techniques combined with weighing lysimeters and soil water measurements can be used to investigate the partitioning of evaporation and transpiration. This study modified a laboratory methodology for field applications and successfully calculated the evaporation and transpiration rates of soybean under natural conditions. The results were consistent with numerical modeling and literature values, confirming the applicability of the modified methodology for partitioning evapotranspiration in the field.
Stable isotope techniques can be used to investigate evapotranspiration and its partitioning into evaporation and transpiration. However, verification is often difficult due to missing information about actual evapotranspiration. Therefore, in this study a methodology tested for laboratory conditions was modified for field applications. Evapotranspiration, which was determined by weighing lysimeters, and isotope techniques were combined with soil water and lysimeter measurements to calculate evaporation and transpiration rates of soybean under natural conditions. The case study was conducted in 2019 in Gross-Enzersdorf, Austria. The results show that the methodology was suited to measure actual variations of evaporation and transpiration ratios, even during dry periods. Weekly evaporation (0.5-2.2 mm d(-1)) and transpiration (1.3-4.3 mm d(-1)) rates as well as the respective ratios (transpiration 43-85%) agreed with the results of numerical modelling and values from the literature, confirming the applicability of the modified methodology for portioning evapotranspiration in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available