4.5 Article

Contrasting environmental drivers of genetic and phenotypic divergence in an Andean poison frog (Epipedobates anthonyi)

Journal

HEREDITY
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages 33-44

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00481-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Secretaria Nacional de Educacion Superior, Ciencia y Tecnologia del Ecuador
  2. Barsa Scholarship Award from De Sa InterAmerican Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examined phenotypic and genetic divergence in 35 populations of Epipedobates anthonyi poison frogs along elevational gradients in the Ecuadorian Andes. Despite low genetic divergence, phenotypic divergence was observed and explained by landscape resistance and environmental differences, suggesting both isolation-by-resistance and isolation-by-environment mechanisms. Environmental variation has a dual effect on population divergence, affecting gene flow and selective pressures on phenotypic traits.
Phenotypic and genetic divergence are shaped by the homogenizing effects of gene flow and the differentiating processes of genetic drift and local adaptation. Herein, we examined the mechanisms that underlie phenotypic (size and color) and genetic divergence in 35 populations (535 individuals) of the poison frog Epipedobates anthonyi along four elevational gradients (0-1800 m asl) in the Ecuadorian Andes. We found phenotypic divergence in size and color despite relatively low genetic divergence at neutral microsatellite loci. Genetic and phenotypic divergence were both explained by landscape resistance between sites (isolation-by-resistance, IBR), likely due to a cold and dry mountain ridge between the northern and southern elevational transects that limits dispersal and separates two color morphs. Moreover, environmental differences among sites also explained genetic and phenotypic divergence, suggesting isolation-by-environment (IBE). When northern and southern transects were analyzed separately, genetic divergence was predicted either by distance (isolation-by-distance, IBD; northern) or environmental resistance between sites (IBR; southern). In contrast, phenotypic divergence was primarily explained by environmental differences among sites, supporting the IBE hypothesis. These results indicate that although distance and geographic barriers are important drivers of population divergence, environmental variation has a two-fold effect on population divergence. On the one hand, landscape resistance between sites reduces gene flow (IBR), while on the other hand, environmental differences among sites exert divergent selective pressures on phenotypic traits (IBE). Our work highlights the importance of studying both genetic and phenotypic divergence to better understand the processes of population divergence and speciation along ecological gradients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available