4.4 Article

Safety and outcome of nurse-led syncope clinics and implantable loop recorder implants

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 443-447

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.11.006

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Implantable loop recorder; Nurse-led clinic; Pacemaker implant; Syncope

Funding

  1. RD department

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nurse-led implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are safe and effective in achieving symptom-rhythm correlation. Nurse-led syncope clinics have a significant impact on management compared to physician-led clinics. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate their long-term impact.
BACKGROUND Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are effective in achieving symptom-rhythm correlation. Data on the diagnostic yield of ILRs, on nurse-led syncope clinics, and on nurse-led ILR implants are limited. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the safety and efficacy of our nurse-led syncope clinic and nurse-led ILR implants. METHODS A retrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing nurse-led ILR implantations was performed between April 2016 and April 2018. Patients were referred from both nurse-led and physician-led clinics. Data were collected on baseline demographic characteristics, referral source, symptom-rhythm correlation, ILR findings, and subsequent changes to management. All ILRs were enrolled into remote monitoring with automatic arrhythmia detection, and all immediate (<= 24 hours) ILR implant complications were recorded. Comparisons were made between nurse-led and physician-led clinics and subsequent outcomes. RESULTS A total of 432 patients with an ILR were identified: 164 (38%) from nurse-led and 268 (62%) from physician-led clinics; 200 (46%) were women (mean age 66.5 +/- 18.2 years; mean follow-up duration 28.9 +/- 9.5 months). Primary ILR indications were syncope (n = 251 [58%]), presyncope (n = 33 [7%]), palpitation (n = 39 [9%]), cryptogenic stroke (n = 78 [18%]), and other reasons (n = 31 [7%]). No immediate ILR implant complications occurred. Overall, 156 patients (36%) had a change in management as a direct result of ILR findings, with no overall differences between nurse-led and physician-led clinics (35% vs 36%; P = .7). More patients had newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in physician-led clinics (15% vs 7%; P = .01), and more patients had pacemaker implants for bradycardia in nurse-led clinics (23% vs 13%; P < .01). CONCLUSION Nurse-led ILR implantation was safe and effective. Nurse-led syncope clinics achieved good symptom-rhythm correlation with resultant significant changes to management in comparison to physician-led clinics. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate their longer-term impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available