A Multimethod Approach to Measuring Communal Coping in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Objective: Communal coping with a chronic illness has been associated with better health outcomes and includes two components: an individual's appraisal of the illness as shared and collaborative strategies to manage the illness. Although multiple methods have been used to assess these constructs, there is limited understanding of whether these methods tap similar components of communal coping. The study goals were to assess how individuals diagnosed with type 1 diabetes communally cope with their romantic partner using multiple methods to (a) distinguish between the two components of communal coping and (b) examine links of both components to health outcomes and test whether interactions between the two are linked to health outcomes. Method: Individuals with type 1 diabetes (n = 199, 52% female, 90% non-Hispanic white) completed self-report, diary, observational, and open-ended interviews to measure communal coping. Psychological well-being, diabetes distress, and diabetes health outcomes were assessed. Results: A confirmatory factor analysis supported our hypothesis that communal coping is reflected by 2 distinct components: shared appraisal and collaborative coping. There were no direct effects of either shared appraisal or collaboration to outcomes, however, the interaction between shared appraisal and collaboration was linked to diabetes distress, self-care, and self-efficacy. Specifically, collaboration was linked to worse outcomes at low shared appraisal but not high shared appraisal. Conclusions: These findings support the two components of communal coping and suggest that collaboration can be detrimental for health among those who do not view an illness as shared.

Automated summary

Communal coping with chronic illness involves shared appraisal and collaborative coping, with collaboration potentially having negative effects on health outcomes when there is low shared appraisal.