Journal
HEALTH AFFAIRS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 237-246Publisher
PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01409
Keywords
-
Funding
- Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services [U1CRH30539]
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences [T32-GM081740]
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Policy Research Scholars Program
- National Network of Public Health Institutes
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Examining the spatial access to healthcare across different regions is crucial for understanding structural inequalities in the United States. This study found that in rural areas, ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) predominantly inhabited by Black or American Indian/Alaska Native populations were located further away from healthcare services compared to those with a high White population. Conversely, in urban areas, ZCTAs with a high White population were farther from most services. These disparities may result from housing policies that limit opportunities and federal health policies that prioritize service provision over community needs. The study also highlights the limitations of using a single metric, such as distance, to assess healthcare access on a national scale.
Examining how spatial access to health care varies across geography is key to documenting structural inequalities in the United States. In this article and the accompanying StoryMap, our team identified ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) with the largest share of minoritized racial and ethnic populations and measured distances to the nearest hospital offering emergency services, trauma care, obstetrics, outpatient surgery, intensive care, and cardiac care. In rural areas, ZCTAs with high Black or American Indian/Alaska Native representation were significantly farther from services than ZCTAs with high White representation. The opposite was true for urban ZCTAs, with high White ZCTAs being farther from most services. These patterns likely result from a combination of housing policies that restrict housing opportunities and federal health policies that are based on service provision rather than community need. The findings also illustrate the difficulty of using a single metric-distance-to investigate access to care on a national scale.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available