4.6 Article

Second-line olaparib maintenance therapy is associated with poor response to subsequent chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutated epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicentre retrospective study

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 1, Pages 97-104

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.02.002

Keywords

Ovarian neoplasms; Carcinoma; Ovarian Epithelial; Olaparib; Prognosis; Recurrence; Survival

Funding

  1. Bumsuk Academic Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective observational study examined the impact of olaparib on subsequent therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. The results showed that patients receiving olaparib maintenance therapy had a poorer response to third-line chemotherapy, suggesting a potential resistance to olaparib.
Introduction. With expanded use of poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), there is a potential impact of PARPi resistance on platinum resistance. A post-hoc analysis of SOLO2 demonstrated a reduction in response to subsequent platinum-based therapy among patients who received prior olaparib but not placebo. The present multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted to determine the effects of olaparib on subsequent therapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Materials and methods. Data on EOC patients with BRCA1/2-mutated tumours who received second-line platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2012 and June 2020, at three South Korean institutions (n = 197) were collected. Patients who received olaparib as maintenance therapy after second-line chemotherapy were assigned to the olaparib group (n = 105), and subjects who did not receive olaparibmaintenance therapy were assigned to the control group (n = 92). The primary endpoint was time intervals from the date of second disease progression (PFS1) to the date of third disease progression (PFS2), expressed as PFS2 - PFS1. Results. As expected, PFS1 in the olaparib group was longer than the control group. However, PFS2 - PFS1 in the olaparib group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (median 7.9 vs. 13.6 m; p = 0.0005). Even when the third-line PARPi maintenance (cross-over) patients were excluded from the control group, the response to subsequent therapy in the olaparib group remained poor (median 7.7 vs. 11.5; p = 0.0422). Discussions. Patients with platinum-sensitive BRCA1/2 mutated tumours who progressed during olaparib maintenance after second-line chemotherapy were less likely to respond to third-line chemotherapy compared to controls who did not receive olaparib, suggesting that resistance to olaparibmay contribute to chemotherapy resistance. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available