4.8 Article

Electrocatalytic hydrogenation of lignin monomer to methoxy-cyclohexanes with high faradaic efficiency

Journal

GREEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 142-146

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc03523a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21972096]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [JCYJ20190808150615285]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the development of carbon-felt supported ternary RhPtRu catalysts with a record faradaic efficiency of 62.8% and selectivity of 91.2% to methoxy-cyclohexanes from guaiacol. The catalyst shows a strong inhibition effect on the cleavage of the methoxy group, leading to the best performance compared to previous reports. A brief TEA was conducted to demonstrate a profitable electrocatalytic hydrogenation of guaiacol to high-value methoxy-cyclohexanes using the designed RhPtRu ternary catalysts.
Developing efficient renewable electrocatalytic processes in chemical manufacturing is of commercial interest, especially from biomass-derived feedstock. Selective electrocatalytic hydrogenation (ECH) of biomass-derived lignin monomers to high-value oxygen-functional compounds is promising towards achieving this goal. However, ECH has to date lacked the satisfied selectivity to upgrade lignin monomers to high-value oxygenated chemicals due to the reduction of vulnerable -OCH3 that exists in most lignin monomers. Herein we report carbon-felt supported ternary RhPtRu catalysts with a record faradaic efficiency (FE) of 62.8% and selectivity of 91.2% to methoxy-cyclohexanes (2-methoxy-cyclohexanol and 2-methoxy-cyclohexanone) from guaiacol, via a strong inhibition effect on the cleavage of the methoxy group, representing the best performance compared to previous reports. We further conducted a brief TEA to demonstrate a profitable ECH of guaiacol to high-value methoxy-cyclohexanes using our designed RhPtRu ternary catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available