4.4 Review

Capturing the experiences of patients with inherited optic neuropathies: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative studies

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05534-0

Keywords

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy; Dominant optic atrophy; Quality of life; Patient-reported outcome measure

Categories

Funding

  1. Royal Society Te Aparangi -Rutherford Foundation
  2. Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust
  3. Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP)
  4. UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR301696]
  5. UK Medical Research Council (MRC) [G1002570]
  6. Fight for Sight (UK)
  7. Isaac Newton Trust (UK)
  8. Moorfields Eye Charity [GR001376]
  9. Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust
  10. National Eye Research Centre (UK)
  11. International Foundation for Optic Nerve Disease (IFOND)
  12. NIHR, Rare Diseases Translational Research Collaboration
  13. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [BRC-1215-20014]
  14. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
  15. UCL Institute of Ophthalmology
  16. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR301696] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate studies capturing the experience of individuals affected by inherited optic neuropathy, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures and qualitative research. Six studies were included, identifying five PROMs and highlighting the need for developing a more comprehensive PROM for individuals with ION.
Purpose To identify and comprehensively evaluate studies capturing the experience of individuals affected by an inherited optic neuropathy (ION), focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative studies where the health status and quality of life (QoL) of these individuals have been explored. Methods Systematic review of five databases using a search strategy combining four concepts: (1) ION; (2) QoL and health status; (3) PROMs; and (4) qualitative research. Studies assessing the impact of ION on any QoL domain using a PROM or qualitative methodology were included and appraised, using criteria based on the COSMIN checklist (for PROM studies) and the CASP checklist (for qualitative studies). Results Of 1326 unique articles identified, six studies were included. Five PROMs were identified: Visual Function Index (VF-14); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); a novel graphical online assessment tool (NGOAT) for reporting emotional response to vision loss; a new PROM informed by the DSM-V Criteria for Major Depressive Disorder; and an interpersonal and career 'impact rating' PROM. The psychometric performance of included PROMs were poorly described. Qualitative studies found that vision loss resulted in psychosocial losses including loss of social and communication skills and loss of independence and freedom. Factors that modified the response to vision loss were also identified. Conclusion The current PROMs used by individuals with ION have poor content coverage, primarily measuring activity limitation and emotional well-being, and insufficient reporting of psychometric performance. There is a need to develop a PROM for individuals ION to report their experiences of living with their condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available