4.4 Article

Cost-minimisation analysis of a treat-and-extend regimen with anti-VEGFs in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05359-x

Keywords

Anti-VEGFs; Treat-and-extend regimen; Age-related macular degeneration; Cost minimisation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) are effective in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), the burden on the healthcare system is considerable. A treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen can help optimise nAMD treatment by reducing the number of injections. Bevacizumab is the cheapest treatment option, with aflibercept and ranibizumab following as the second and third choices.
Purpose Although intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) are effective as treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), the (economic) burden on the healthcare system is considerable. A treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen is associated with a lower number of injections without compromising the effectiveness and can therefore help optimise nAMD treatment. This study investigates the per-patient costs associated with nAMD treatment, when using aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab with a T&E regimen. Methods In this cost-minimisation model, the per-patient costs in the Netherlands were modelled using a healthcare payers' perspective over a 3-year time horizon with the assumption that efficacy of treatments is similar. Additionally, the break-even price of the different anti-VEGFs was calculated relative to the cheapest option and injection frequency. Results The injection frequency varied from 14.2 for aflibercept to 27.4 for bevacizumab in 3 years. Nonetheless, bevacizumab remains the cheapest treatment option (euro14,215), followed by aflibercept (euro18,202) and ranibizumab (euro31,048). The medication covers the majority of the per-patient costs for aflibercept and ranibizumab, while administration covers the majority of the per-patient costs for bevacizumab. The break-even prices of aflibercept and ranibizumab are respectively euro507 and euro60.58 per injection. Brolucizumab was included in the scenario analysis and was more expensive than aflibercept (euro20,446). Brolucizumab should reduce to 13.8 injections over 3 years to be as costly as aflibercept. Conclusion Bevacizumab is the cheapest anti-VEGF treatment. The list prices of all anti-VEGFs should reduce to be as costly as bevacizumab. Aflibercept is the second-choice treatment and so far brolucizumab is not.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available