4.7 Article

Socio-economic and climatic changes lead to contrasting global urban vegetation trends

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102385

Keywords

Economic development; Population change; Climate change; Urban greening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban greening can enhance quality of life by generating ecosystem services, with positive vegetation trends widely observed in cities in Europe and North America, while negative trends are primarily found in Africa, South America, and Asia. Economic development, population growth, and temperature are the main drivers of contrasting changes in urban vegetation compared to surrounding areas across continents.
Urban greening can enhance quality of life by generating ecosystem services and has been proposed as a way of mitigating adverse consequences of global warming for human health. However, there is limited knowledge on global trends in urban vegetation and their relation to economic development and climate change. Here we studied 1,688 major cities worldwide and show that 70% (1,181) show an increase in vegetation derived from satellite observations (2000-2018). For 68% (1,138) of the cities studied, the increase in the urban vegetation is less strong as compared to the vegetation increase found in the surroundings of these cities. Overall, positive vegetation trends are widely observed in cities in Europe and North America, whereas negative vegetation trends in cities occur primarily in Africa, South America and Asia. Gross Domestic Product growth, population growth as well as temperature are found to be the main underlying drivers of the observed contrasts in changes in urban vegetation as compared to surrounding areas across continents. From a global synthesis of urban vegetation change, we quantify the role of social-economic development and climate change in regulating urban vegetation growth, and the contrasting imprint on cities of developed and developing countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available