4.7 Article

Capillary Heterogeneity Linked to Methane Lateral Migration in Shallow Unconfined Aquifers

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL095685

Keywords

sedimentary architecture; capillary pressure heterogeneity; methane distribution within aquifer; shallow unconfined aquifers; atmospheric leakage

Funding

  1. University of Cincinnati

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlights the importance of capillary pressure heterogeneity in sedimentary architecture for the lateral migration of CH4 in aquifers. It shows that meter-scale sedimentary stratification plays a significant role in CH4 plume migration compared to finer scale strata. Understanding sedimentary architecture and capillary pressure heterogeneity is crucial for accurately assessing the extent of gaseous CH4 leakage and its impacts on groundwater quality and global warming.
We investigate mechanisms that enhance lateral methane (CH4) plume migration in shallow aquifers that exhibit complex and multiscale sedimentary architecture. We show how heterogeneity in capillary pressure characteristics related to the sedimentary architecture causes gaseous CH4 to spread over larger areas by retarding, deviating, or blocking upward buoyancy-driven CH4 migration. Simplifying or ignoring capillary pressure heterogeneity thus leads to overestimation of leaked CH4 to the atmosphere, and underestimation of mobile gaseous CH4 in aquifer. We show, both qualitatively and quantitatively, that meter-scale sedimentary stratification contributes more to CH4 plume migration than the millimeter- and centimeter-scale strata comprising them. Results indicate that the extent of gaseous CH4 leakage, and its associated impacts on groundwater quality and global warming, cannot be accurately assessed unless the sedimentary architecture and resulting heterogeneity in capillary pressure are represented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available