Journal
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL096758
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [51909117]
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control [2017B030301012]
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Pollution Control
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study challenges the reliability of using linear or non-linear correlation to study drought propagation, and proposes a causality analysis method based on pure observations. The effectiveness of this method in detecting drought propagation, especially in determining the direction, is proven.
The essence of propagation from meteorological to hydrological drought is the cause-effect relationship between precipitation and runoff. This study challenged the reliability of applying linear or non-linear correlation (i.e., closeness/similarity, a non-directional scalar) to study drought propagation (i.e., causality, a directional vector). Meanwhile, in the field of hydrometeorology, causality analysis is burgeoning in model simulations, but still rare in analyzing the observations. Therefore, this study aims to provide a new perspective on drought propagation (i.e., causality) using convergent cross mapping (CCM) based on pure observations. Compared with the results in previous studies, the effectiveness of applying causality analysis in drought propagation study was proven, indicating that causality analysis would be more powerful than correlation analysis, especially for detecting drought propagation direction. Plain Language Summary The cause-effect relationship (causality) between meteorological and hydrological drought is clear, that is, precipitation deficit can lead to decrease in runoff. Naturally, a significant correlation between the behaviors of precipitation and runoff is expected, based on which the drought propagation time can be calculated. This study is inspired by the existence of spurious correlation, which implies that correlation is commonly confused with causality. Though the causality in drought propagation study is physically logical, spurious correlation accentuates the irrationality of applying correlation analysis wherever causality concerns. Hence, this study applied causality analysis to explore drought propagation, and the results were satisfying especially in detecting two main characteristics of drought propagation: direction and time. Nevertheless, this study not only aims to apply a new method in detecting drought propagation direction and time, but also to reassess the nature of drought propagation. We advocate to reject the overuse of correlation analysis and embraces the true causality analysis in the field of hydrometeorology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available