4.7 Article

The Basal Detectability of an Ice-Covered Mars by MARSIS

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL096518

Keywords

Mars; polar cap; basal composition; radar sounding; ice; water

Funding

  1. French space agency (CNES)
  2. NASA [80NSSC19K1492]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detection of anomalously strong basal reflectivity beneath the Martian South Polar Layered Deposits (SPLD) has led to hypotheses suggesting the presence of basal materials such as liquid water. By analyzing existing data, we found that a certain percentage of the Martian surface could produce basal reflections similar to SPLD measurements under the assumption of impure ice. To prevent bright SPLD-like basal reflections, an ice loss tangent > $ > $0.01 is required. The detected bright terrains are mainly located within volcanic constructs of different geological epochs.
The detection of anomalously strong relative basal reflectivity beneath the Martian South Polar Layered Deposits (SPLD) from the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding (MARSIS) has led to hypotheses suggesting the presence of basal materials such as liquid water. Here, we propose a forward approach to assess whether such a high signal could be produced by a Martian terrain currently exposed at the surface without liquid water. We convert existing MARSIS surface reflectivity measurements into a basal reflectivity as if it were overlaid by an SPLD-like ice deposit. 0.3%-2% of the surface could produce basal reflections of magnitude similar to the SPLD measurements in the assumption of a 10% impure ice. An ice loss tangent > $ > $0.01 is required to prevent any of the current Martian surface from producing a bright SPLD-like basal reflection. The detected bright terrains are gathered within volcanic constructs of diverse geologic epoch.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available