4.7 Article

Global Survey of the MJO and Extreme Precipitation

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL094691

Keywords

MJO; extreme precipitation; satellite precipitation

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX16AE33G]
  2. NOAA [NA18OAR4310297]
  3. NOAA through the Cooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies [NA19NES4320002]
  4. NASA [906066, NNX16AE33G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the modulation of land-based extreme precipitation by the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO) globally. Different phases of the MJO lead to different outcomes in extreme events in various regions around the world. The results provide insights into the mechanisms behind extreme precipitation events in different regions and offer new perspectives for subseasonal forecasts of extreme events.
This study examines the modulation of land-based extreme precipitation around the globe by the Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO). The upper-level convergent phase of the MJO inhibits extreme events over most regions but enhancement in other phases falls in three categories. Over Brazil, Southeast Asia, and Australia, 2-year rainfall events are most common near the core of the upper-level divergence as expected. For most other regions in the tropics and subtropics, the extreme events occur along the periphery of the MJO's envelope. Previous regional studies suggest these extremes are driven by the MJO's low-level circulation either advecting moisture or interacting with orography rather than directly increasing the vertical convection. Finally, extratropical extreme events are more likely associated with the MJO's impact on extratropical wave trains or tropical cyclones. Given the increasing skill of numerical models for predicting the MJO, these results could lead to subseasonal forecasts of extreme events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available